|
“The Commission acted without notice, hearing, evidence or written
order and without conducting a contested case hearing or promulgating a
regulation subject to approval by the General Assembly,” they continue.
The Commisison argues it took up surgery center fees under the umbrella
of its Hospital Advisory Committee and that committee’s work was
publicized. But the heart of the Commission’s position is that it has
the authority under current regulations to set fees for providers and
need not go before the General Assembly. The agency maintains the
surgery centers have no inherent “property interest” because they know
prospectively what their fees would be and are free to decide whether
or not to treat workers’ compensation patients.
In 2009, Judge John M Milling, presiding judge Fifth Judicial Circuit,
ruled the surgery centers were denied due process. The court said
before making changes to the payment system, the Commission should have
promulgated a new regulation and had it approved by the General
Assembly. This process would have given involved parties appropriate
notice and warning of impending changes.
Judge Milling concluded the Commission cannot enforce the new payment
system against the surgery centers until it develops a regulation that
is in accordance with the Administrative Procedures Act and has been
reviewed and approved by the General Assembly. “The adoption of a
Regulation will afford the Plaintiffs with certain due process rights,
including notice, an opportunity to be heard, and the opportunity for
review and approval by the General Assembly,” the judge ruled.
The Commission appealed the ruling and requested the state Supreme
Court to intervene in the matter. In the meanwhile, the surgery centers
can continue to bill as before, but perhaps tempered by market forces.
There is some suggestion that employers are directing injured workers
to less expensive alternatives.
The Commission has previously noted South Carolina needs a new fee
schedule because outpatient charges have been rising substantially.
Specifically, from 2000 to 2006, the number of workers’ compensation
cases seen by ambulatory surgery centers increased 64%, while total
charges increased 324%. The Commission also reports that between
2006-2008, the number of cases increased an additional 25% while
charges increased 45%.
|